Distant Healing
Part 2 of a review of distant healing studies by Daniel J. Benor, MD.
Distant healing effects on plants
Plants make good experimental subjects. They are inexpensive, low maintenance, and require no elaborate permission forms (as human studies do).
You could easily test your own healing abilities with plants. Take three pots of the same size, filled with soil from the same source. Take three batches of seeds from the same packet. Large ones, such as corn seeds, are handy, as you can plant them with their pointy ends down, each to the same, measured depth.
Place the pots where they will each get the same intensity and duration of light, and water them with measured, equal amounts of water. Send positive thoughts or prayers to the first, leave the middle one alone, and send negative thoughts to the third. After two weeks you may see easily-visible differences in the growth rates in each pot.
Formal studies have shown significant effects of distant healing with plants (49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54).
Other studies showed no effects of distant healing on plants (55, 56). Each of these studies had problems in their designs that might explain the failures to demonstrate healing effects.
Distant healing effects on bacteria and yeasts
Distant healing produced significant effects on enhancing and retarding growth of bacteria (57, 58, 59) and yeasts (60, 61).
These studies suggest that healers may be able to slow or halt the progress of an infection by retarding the growth of infecting organisms.
Carroll Nash (62) explored effects of distant healing on bacteria that mutate between two forms, "lac negative" and "lac positive," showing that healing could selectively increase either form. If this is an effect on mutation, it provides encouragement to believe that healing might influence mutating cells, such as cancers, in the body. However, as Nash notes, an alternative hypothesis is that the distant healing selectively influenced the growth of one or the other form rather than influencing mutation rates.
The implications of this study are discussed below.
Distant healing effects on single-celled organisms
C. M. Pleass and Dean Dey (63) explored effects of mental intent on the motility of algae. In their first experiment they found highly significant effects. In their second experiment, replicating the first, they found no significant effects.
It is not unusual in parapsychology to find this sort of difficulty in replications, and several other replications of (touch or near-the-body) healing studies have shown no effects.
Distant healing effects on cells in the laboratory (in vitro)
William Braud and colleagues showed that healers could slow the rate of hemolysis -- the bursting of red blood cells placed in dilute saline (64, 65).
The most likely mechanism for this effect is a strengthening of the cell wall of the red blood cells. If this is the case, it might explain some of the mechanisms for many healing effects. The cell wall is a very active transport system for moving fluid, chemicals, and molecules into and out of the cell. If healing can alter these gateways, it may enhance cellular functions and increase protection of the cell from negative influences.
Another possibility is that the cell wall may act as an antenna for receiving healing "messages."
Franz Snel also showed that distant healing could slow the rate of growth of cancer cells cultured in the laboratory (66).
Distant healing effects of DNA
Glen Rein and Rollin McCraty, at the HeartMath Institute, showed that distant healing could alter the rate of winding and unwinding of strands of DNA (67, 68).
The implications of these studies are far-reaching, indeed. First, this could be a mechanism for the action of healing within the body, since DNA controls many of the functions of cells in the body. Second, if healing intent can influence these complex molecules that control genetics, it is possible that intent could influence heredity and evolution (69). This may be a mechanism for the effects in Nash's study of bacterial mutation.
Discussion
While distant healing appears to contradict our ordinary sense of reality and the laws defined by conventional science, there are theoretical paradigms that appear to offer explanations for healing.
These studies of absent healing introduce Newtonian medicine to the action of mind from a distance, nonlocal consciousness as Larry Dossey terms it (70). This is consonant with the theories of modern physics, that postulate interactions between certain particles from any distance. These hypotheses have been supported by research (71, 72, 73, 74). This is also supported by a wealth of research in parapsychology, demonstrating that minds can interact through telepathy, that a person can obtain information about physical objects from a distance through clairsentient perception, and that direct mental influence over physical objects is possible (75-77).
Distant healing and other non-local effects of energy medicine are acknowledged by several of the complementary therapies (78).
One would hope that the benefits of such an inexpensive intervention would appeal to those who are concerned over the high costs of medical care.
Distant healing research confirms the effects of prayer on health. This does not prove, however, that prayers within any particular religious framework are more effective than any other, or than secular distant healing.
Subjective experiences of healers and healees involved in distant healing further support reports of experiences with prayer in religious settings. Those involved with healing may have a personal sense of heightened spiritual awareness (79).
The issues raised by distant healing research are extremely complex. ISSSEEM is truly at the frontiers of science in exploring these borderlands between Newtonian and quantum worlds, between the realms of matter and of spirit, through the study of subtle energies and energy medicine (80).
REFERENCES
 Original publication: Subtle Energies 2000, 11(3), 249-2664. The International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine (ISSSEEM). 1105 Ralston Rd., Ste. 100D, Arvada, CO 80004, (303) 425-4625 Fax (303) 425-4685 Chief Executive Officer: C. Penny Hiernu www.issseem.org ISSSEEM@compuserve.com
Reprinted with permission of the author and publisher. Daniel J. Benor, M.D. P.O. Box 502 Medford, NJ 08055. Website: www.WholisticHealingResearch.com E-mail: DB@WholisticHealingResearch.com
|